
AI能讀懂你的SaaS嗎?為何llms.txt優於MCP,造福開發者
文章探討SaaS供應商如何讓其服務易於AI代理理解,以適應AI時代。文中比較了MCP方法與llms.txt標準,並主張llms.txt透過提供AI生成程式碼所需的知識,賦予開發者更大的自主權。
Sign up
Sign in
Sign up
Sign in

Can AI Read Your SaaS?

--
Listen
Share
What Interface Should SaaS Provide in the Age of AI?
“How do I integrate this API?”
When building side projects, you face this situation multiple times a day. Payment systems, push notifications, deep links, analytics tools… You spend hours reading each SaaS documentation, finding example code, and modifying it to fit your project.
But things are different now.
When you tell Claude or ChatGPT “Write code to create a deep link with Limelink”? Working code appears in 10 seconds. Or at least, it should.
The problem is that most SaaS aren’t ready for the AI era yet.
1. The Era of AI Agents Writing Code
In 2025, the development paradigm has shifted.
AI coding agents like Cursor, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot have taken over developers’ daily lives. They go beyond simple code autocompletion to generate ”complete code that integrates a specific SaaS into my project.”
But there’s a condition.
The AI must “know” that SaaS.
2. MCP vs llms.txt: Fish vs Fishing Rod
There are two main approaches to building AI-friendly SaaS.
MCP Server Approach: “I’ll do it for you”
MCP (Model Context Protocol) is a protocol that allows AI agents to communicate directly with external services. When a SaaS provides an MCP server, AI agents perform tasks in real-time through that server.
Pros:
Cons:
llms.txt Approach: “I’ll teach you how to do it yourself”
llms.txt is a standard that provides service documentation in a format AI can understand. AI agents read this document and generate code tailored to the user’s project.
Pros:
The Key Difference:
What do developers building side projects really need?
Obviously the latter. Creating one deep link with MCP is easy, but integrating deep link logic throughout your app requires code.
3. llms.txt Usage Examples by Agent
Let’s see how AI agents actually use llms.txt.
Claude (Web/Desktop)
Claude uses llms.txt through the Projects feature.
Claude references the API specs and SDK documentation from llms.txt to generate ready-to-use Swift code.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT uses it directly in GPTs or conversations.
ChatGPT generates platform-specific code based on the documentation.
Cursor / Claude Code
IDE-integrated agents are even more powerful.
Then request from the agent:
The agent:
One enter to integrate SaaS.
4. Interfaces SaaS Must Provide in the AI Era
So what should SaaS providers prepare?
1. Provide llms.txt (Required)
Place an /llms.txt file at your website root. This file contains:
All written in Markdown format. It’s the format AI understands best.
2. Structured API Documentation
3. Platform-specific SDK Examples
Provide example code for major platforms like iOS, Android, React Native, and Flutter. AI references these to generate code matching the user’s environment.
4. (Optional) MCP Server
If llms.txt is “teaching how to fish,” MCP server is a tool for “quick experience.”
Conclusion & CTA
In the AI era, SaaS must be in a state where “when a developer asks, AI can write the code.
If MCP server catches fish for you, llms.txt teaches you how to fish.
What developers building side projects need isn’t one-time help. It’s code that can be permanently integrated into their project.
A SaaS that provides llms.txt is essentially saying to developers:
“Just ask Claude. You’ll get working code instantly.”
One enter to integrate any SaaS.
This will become the standard for developer experience in the AI era.
Start right now:
10 seconds later, working code will be right in front of you.
References
--
--


Written by Limelink
https://limelink.org/ The most easily implementable Dynamic Links
No responses yet
Help
Status
About
Careers
Press
Blog
Privacy
Rules
Terms
Text to speech
相關文章