
運用AI開發,避免產出劣質品
本文主張在AI輔助開發中採取更審慎的態度,強調產品判斷與品質勝過單純的快速建構。文章警示我們將被大量易於產出卻無價值的AI生成內容淹沒,並呼籲轉向有意義的創作。


Build With Attitude ✊ - An Open Invitation To Vibecoders Who Care About Building Things That Matter
AI made building easy. 2026 will decide if we make it meaningful.




We’re about to drown in things that were easy to build and never worth shipping.
Not for the user. Not for the builder.
In 2025, the message around AI was simple:
Look what I built! Here’s how you can build it too.
And that message still matters, it’s key to encouraging beginners to start experimenting.
But as we enter 2026, that’s no longer enough.
It’s time to graduate from:
Look what I built! Here’s how you can build it too.
to:
Look what I built! Here’s how you can build it too, and how I think along the way.


AI Product Manager, builder of StackShelf.app and Attitudevault.dev on a mission to create value, not AI slop.If you’re new here, welcome! Here’s what you might have missed: 2025’s Most Absurd Product Decisions How To Product-think When AI Builds At Lightning SpeedThe Ultimate Vibecoding Guide From Builders Who’ve Shipped
Subscribe 🤗
Why With Attitude ✊

Because building with AI is getting easier, but thinking well is not.
AI can help us generate code, screens, flows, and features at unprecedented speed.
What it can’t do for us is decide what’s worth building, what isn’t, and where value actually lives.
Lovable, Replit and Cursor - while they’re all impressive, high-leverage and value-enabling tools, they’re just that - tools. And as such they can’t (and shouldn’t!) replace our own critical thinking.
That’s where our judgment comes in.
That’s where product thinking comes in.
And that’s what Build With Attitude is about.
In Xian’s words:

What We Mean By AI slop
In this series, AI slop doesn’t mean “AI-generated.”
It means output without judgment: mass-produced, low-quality, and unwanted output (content, code, products, videos) created because it can be generated, not because it should exist.
It’s what happens when execution is automated but responsibility is not.

The Snake-Eats-Its-Own-Tail Loop
A super clear explanation comes from Kurzgesagt, genuinely one of the best learning channels on YouTube, whether you’re 8 or 48.
In their 2025 video AI Slop Is Destroying The Internet, they describe a golden era of soulless slop: low-effort garbage flooding every platform simply because it costs nothing to produce.
Text, images, videos, books, news. All of it padded out with synthetic filler that looks confident, sounds plausible, and means almost nothing.
The most unsettling part is the loop:
Slop gets published ➜ Slop gets scraped ➜ Slop gets fed back into the next generation of models ➜ People start treating it as “knowledge.”
The snake eating its own tail.
I see a similar loop emerging in AI-generated products:


What This Series Actually Is
Each edition centers on a real builder and a real project: not only as a case study, but as a thinking artifact.
We don’t just look at what was built. We examine how decisions were made, where human judgment was key, and what tradeoffs looked like in practice.
The goal is to learn from the hundreds of big and small decisions builders make as they try to create value, rather than contribute to AI slop.
The moment the idea became worth pursuing
The trade-offs that shaped the product’s character
The features that were deliberately left on the cutting board
Where AI accelerated execution, and where it misled
The judgement calls no model could make on our behalf

Who This Invitation Is For
You don’t need a finished product or a perfect story.
You do need curiosity, a willingness to show your thinking, and the courage to talk about what didn’t work.
This invitation is for builders who’d rather be honest than impressive,who believe the most valuable thing they can share isn’t polish, but lived perspective.

Why I See Contributors as the Most Glamorous Builders
This series wouldn’t exist without people willing to admit how they think, and where they got it wrong.
That’s hard enough to do in front of a bathroom mirror, harder in a meeting room, and simply brave in public.
It’s far easier to share a confident takeaway, or one of those “I built this over the weekend and made 10k” stories that travel well on social media and require no follow-up questions.
It’s much harder to share uncertainty. Second thoughts. Or the humbling moment when you realize that the thing you were so excited about matters to no one.
So every time I see a creator doing that publicly, I nod with respect, knowing something important happens:
They help someone who’s stuck realize they’re not broken
They help someone navigating a career shaped by AI see where to think critically
They help us hold the line against AI slop.

The Builders Kicking Things Off
Here are some of the wonderful people who have already expressed interest in joining the series (or whom I’ve personally invited).


How To Participate
This is an open invitation. Anyone building with AI is welcome to participate, just fill out the interview form below:
👉 Interview Questions
Afterwards, I will:
DM you with a suggested publish date
Synthesize your answers into a narrative post
Send you the draft for review
1–3 days before publishing I’ll also send you shareable snippets, so we can share with our network
Once the post is published, I’ll add you to the Builders With Attitude 2026 poster.

Share
You Might Also Enjoy
👉 Vibecoding x Cybersecurity👉 Claude Skills Are Taking the AI Community by Storm👉 Why “it feels worse” is the wrong metric for evaluating ChatGPT-5.2
From The Community
Happy New AI Year by Ruben Hassid 2025 Recap: The Year the Old Rules Broke by Michael Spencer and Jess LeãoNo ChatGPT Wrapped in My Region. So I Reverse-Engineered It by AI Meets Girlboss
New On Stackshelf.app

Jose Parreño Garcia added 50+ Data Science Templates ➜ view shelf.
Karen Spinner build two chrome extensions: Substack Reader and Prompt Collector ➜ view shelf.
Join hundreds of Premium Members and unlock everything you need to build with AI. From prompt packs and code blocks to learning paths, discounts and the community that makes it so special.
SUBSCRIBE 🤗














![]()

This project will be beneficial to the readers AND the builders contributing.
Going through the questions is helping me clarify my thinking on the project.
They are very thoughtful and solidifying the WHY behind my build.

A few things that really landed for me:
-
"Execution is automated but responsibility is not." That's the whole tension in one line. The tools don't care what gets shipped. We have to.
-
The shift from "here's how you can build it too" to "here's how I think along the way." I've been spotlighting VibeCoding.Builders for the past few months, and the stories that teach the most are never the clean success stories. It's the decision points, what they kept, what they cut, where they got stuck and why. That's the stuff people actually need to hear.
-
"It's far easier to share a confident takeaway... It's much harder to share uncertainty." This is exactly why featuring real builders matters. The messy middle is where the learning lives.
Grateful to be part of this series, feels like we're pulling in the same direction. 🙌
No posts
Ready for more?
相關文章