我如何使用AI編碼工具(2025年冬季)

Hacker News·

作者分享了他們使用AI編碼工具的最新體驗,發現Claude Code在速度和效率上優於Codex。他們強調了AI工具顯著提升開發者生產力的能力,並將其比喻為一位中級開發者,但運作速度快得多。

How I use AI coding tools (in winter 2025)

Yes, I have written about this recently, but it has changed so much that it warrants an update.

In the meantime we have tried Codex (5.1) for a few months at work. I did not like it, mostly because it is much slower than Claude. We finally went back to Claude Code and Opus 4.5 last month, and this is night and day. I am doing almost everything in Claude Code; there are days I don’t even write a single line in my text editor.

This configuration is basically as good as a mid-level developer, except it does what would take said developer hours in minutes. This means you can give it a task and immediately verify the outcome, then tell it what to improve without switching context and losing your mental model. Once you have figured out how to prompt it efficiently, it becomes a productivity monster. Its usefulness still depends on the task, but I have done things in half a day that I would have estimated to take at least a week without an agent.

For personal projects, I use Amp Free — which is excellent as well — but I still write most code myself due to the nature of the projects themselves.

I am very happy with Claude Code and do not intend to test other coding agents, except maybe Gemini if we get access to it on our plans. I am also curious how good GLM 4.7 in Claude Code would be if I needed a cheaper option. But for now, spending up to $200 / month for such a productivity boost is clearly a no-brainer. Finally, I will probably give beads a try one of those days, I can certainly see how it could help Claude with some tasks.

Hacker News

相關文章

  1. 資深 C 程式設計師評測 AI 程式碼代理

    3 個月前

  2. AI編程的難以忍受之慢

    8 個月前

  3. Ask HN:如何提升我的AI輔助程式設計能力?

    4 個月前

  4. 懷疑論者對同事的 AI 編碼工作流程印象深刻

    4 個月前

  5. 使用 Claude Code 進行 AI 輔助編碼的最佳實踐與建構 Claude.md

    3 個月前