懷疑論者對同事的 AI 編碼工作流程印象深刻

Here's what he had to say about his workflow that prompted our discussion:

"I’m (we’re) kicking out feature after feature that is being done right because I have an agentic AI flow that not only writes code virtually exactly the same way I would manually (after many, many prompts to update the AGENTS.md file), but I’m confident in it due to the review flow itself.

I am using OpenAI’s for their codex cli tool which is my main one, but also Claude Code almost as much - the extra veracity you get by having 2 frontier products that can review themselves is probably worth it. And I use Gemini free tier for its extra review some times. Oh and have vs code copilot for its AI autocomplete."

Here's his prompt to create a new feature (truncated a bit for HN char limit):

His question: "question, it seems i get much more productivity gains using you than other people. is this related to the fact that this is a one-language monorepo or no?"

Claude:

So anyway, I'm just curious if others out there are having similar experiences and if they've run into any hidden downsides or upsides.