外部AI推理為何預設上會違反歐盟AI法案的第12條和第61條

Why External AI Reasoning Breaks Articles 12 and 61 of the EU AI Act by Default

Creators

Description

Why probability becomes a governance diagnostic, not a prediction

For many enterprises, the EU AI Act still feels like a future problem. The debate is framed around internal AI systems, model development, and hypothetical harms that will materialize once enforcement begins in earnest.

That framing misses a more immediate exposure.

A compliance gap is already emerging that does not depend on whether an organization builds, deploys, or even authorizes AI systems at all. It arises when external AI reasoning about the organization enters regulated decision pathways without an evidentiary control.

When that happens, compliance does not fail because the AI is inaccurate. It fails because the organization cannot reconstruct what was relied upon.

This article introduces a probability-based diagnostic framework designed to surface that exposure early, before Articles 12 and 61 are tested in enforcement, supervision, or litigation.

Files

Why External AI Reasoning Breaks Articles 12 and 61 of the EU AI act by Default.pdf

Files

     (84.3 kB)

Total views

Total downloads

Total data volume

More info on how stats are collected....

Versions

External resources

Communities

Keywords and subjects

Keywords

Details

Markdown

reStructuredText

HTML

Image URL

Target URL

Rights

Citation

Export

Technical metadata

About

Blog

Help

Developers

Contribute

Funded by

Powered by
CERN Data Centre & InvenioRDM

This site uses cookies. Find out more on how we use cookies